The House of Dynamite and the One World Order

The Monk, the Emperor, and the House of Sunlight and Ash

Long ago, in a kingdom between mountains and sea, there lived a monk who spoke very little.

He spent his days sweeping the temple courtyard and his nights listening to the wind move through bamboo.

One afternoon, the Emperor came to visit him.

The Emperor was uneasy. Whispers of war drifted through the palace. Generals sharpened their blades in anticipation.

Astrologers muttered dark omens beneath their breath. Scribes debated fate and fortune. Court scholars unfurled maps, calculating which nations would fall first.

The Emperor asked the monk:

“Tell me, Master… If the great kingdoms begin to fight, my land will burn, their land will burn. Everyone will lose. Why do the rulers still rush toward the fire?”

The monk put down his broom. He pointed to the temple roof.

There, high above them, sat a sparrow—small, fragile, made of feathers and heartbeat. Yet it clutched in its beak a burning twig stolen from a nearby kitchen fire.

The monk said: “Look at the sparrow. It carries fire to build its nest. Not knowing that if the twig falls, the flame will leap and burn the entire forest.”

The Emperor thought for a moment.

“But that sparrow is foolish,” he said. “Human rulers are not.”

The monk smiled. He picked up a single grain of rice from the floor and held it up.

“When the mind desires a nest large enough to cover the whole world, wisdom becomes smaller than a grain of rice. Even the mightiest rulers turn into sparrows carrying burning twigs.”

The Emperor frowned. “What should be done then? How do I stop the sparrow? How do I save the forest?”

The monk walked to the edge of the courtyard, where a vast plain stretched toward the horizon. There, he pointed to a distant village.

People were working. Children were playing. Women were washing clothes in the river.

They had no idea a conversation about the end of the world was happening in the temple above them.

The monk whispered:

“The forest is already filled with dry leaves. The rulers already carry fire. The people below do not see the smoke. They believe the world is made of sunlight and routine. That is the illusion.”

The Emperor felt a chill. “So is there truly nothing to be done?”

The monk sat down on the stone steps. He closed his eyes.

After a long silence, he said:

“A sparrow drops fire because it believes the nest it carries is more important than the forest it flies over. Kings, priests, merchants, prophets, and modern elites: all of them believe the same. That their dream of a perfect world is worth the ashes of this one.”

The Emperor bowed his head.

“And what is the truth, Master?” he asked softly.

The monk opened his eyes.

In them there was neither fear nor hope—only clarity.

He said:

Then the monk went back to sweeping the courtyard. The Emperor stood there for a long time, watching the tiny bird disappear into the sky: carrying its burning twig into a world that believed itself safe.

And somewhere in the invisible spaces between the mountains and the sea, the wind carried a warning:

The House of Dynamite

Earlier this week, at the recommendation of a friend, let's call him "M", I pushed myself to watch the movie "A House of Dynamite."

"M" has been a student of many an occult traditions, include the Theosophists, and interprets the world at the level of energy. His take on the central theme of this movie was his own. Interesting, esoteric, yet "crazy" for someone who doesn't know him - the logical and deep person that he is.

I insist that you watch the movie, but at least watch this trailer to start off.

At the risk of sharing the critical spoiler, let me state that the movie is frustrating because you are left with the job of completing its plot in your own mind. It leaves you with more questions and a sense of shock in the end.

It's not just a film, you see. It is a mirror. It shows us the world as it is, not as our political speeches pretend it to be.

A House of Dynamite therefore is a stark reminder that we are living every day inside a fragile, nuclearized system that nobody fully controls, where one mistake, one misread signal, or one panicked decision could end millions of lives – and most of us would never see it coming until it’s too late.

The situation as it unfolds, my wife and I were left with a deep sense of disbelief. At the stark unpreparedness and the - almost naive manner in how the processes on which the entire humanity now rests on are approached.

Immediately, I set off on a research binge.

Was what they showed in the movie really true? The question which I was asking around the net -

Here is an interesting video where Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) nuclear expert Erin Dumbacher speaks with writer Noah Oppenheim on the same topic. The plausibility and the accuracy of the plot and the information shared.

The conclusions are shocking. Not as much in their mandate on the assessment of the movie but in what they reveal of how shockingly ill-prepared we are.

The story revolves around the plot of a missile launch, taken to be a test launch, just like some before it and likely to end in the Sea of Japan. There is no conflict going on or any tensions brewing between the United States and its adversaries.

Nothing unusual. Same old.. same old.

And then the trajectory changes. What was to end in a sea is suddenly hurtling towards continental United States.

Towards the center. Mid West.

Chicago.

That changes everything.

So what we have is a very rare combination

• A rogue launch
• Severe miscalculation
• False-flag manipulation
• A proxy/third-party hacking or takeover of the launch chain

Let us go ahead and test some of the central claims and details of its plot.

Checking the Plausibility

We will look at the different claims in the movie and look at their plausibility.

Can North Korea technically hit Chicago with a missile? - YES

North Korea currently fields three intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching deep into the continental United States.

The Hwasong-15, with an estimated range of around 13,000 km, can target major cities like Chicago, New York, and Washington, D.C.

The larger Hwasong-17—often called the “monster ICBM”—extends that reach to nearly 15,000 km, putting the entire U.S. mainland within range.

The Hwasong-18, a solid-fuel ICBM, is even more dangerous because solid fuel enables rapid launch, reduced detection time, and greater stability.

Chicago falls comfortably within reach of both the Hwasong-17 and Hwasong-18.
The movie is not exaggerating this capability.

Source of Attack Ambiguity - YES

When a nuclear or near-nuclear attack is designed to be ambiguous, the risk profile changes completely. You enter the world of strategic deniability, proxy escalation, and forced miscalculation. In this world, a hostile actor doesn't want certainty; they want confusion.

Major powers and their proxies increasingly use: cyberattacks, sabotage, false-flag operations, unattributable drone strikes, dark-fleet shell companies, mercenary groups, covert missile transfers.

The objective: harm the opponent without crossing the redline of attribution.

A nuclear-level strike with built-in deniability is simply an extension of this logic.

There are many ways to create an elaborate mechanism of deniability. A motivated actor could:

• use a rogue submarine from a proxy nation,
• fire from a captured mobile launcher across maritime borders,
• modify an old Russian/Chinese missile variant bought on the black market,
• engineer launch signatures to resemble another nation’s telemetry.

Telemetry spoofing is not fantasy.

Combat GPS Spoofing with MEMS Timing | SiTime

GPS spoofing threatens aviation, defense, and infrastructure. Learn key strategies and tech advancements to secure GPS accuracy and reliability.

Sitime LogoSiTime Editorial

It is publicly documented in Chinese ECM capabilities.

New Type Of GPS Spoofing Attack In China Creates “Crop Circles” Of False Location Data

The eerie patterns are unlike anything experts have seen in previous GPS spoofing incidents, which have typically pointed to a single location.

The War ZoneJoseph Trevithick

It has also been used by

• U.S. DARPA programs,
• Russia’s GLONASS masking operations.

Could a false-flag situation trigger such a plot? — PLAUSIBLE

This is where the movie’s story becomes more realistic.

Real-world scenarios that intelligence services actually prepare for:

A rogue North Korean general or missile regiment acting without Kim’s authorization: NK command is centralized but secrecy + factionalism = always an element of risk.

A cyber breach into the missile command chain: North Korea uses air-gapped but outdated systems. A sophisticated intelligence service (CIA, MSS, GRU) could theoretically:

• spoof launch authorization signals
• cause accidental launch
• misdirect missile telemetry

Rare but not impossible.

A “launch to blame NK” operation by a third actor: Countries like Iran, Pakistan, or even private terror-state hybrids could attempt to:

• smuggle short-range missiles
• use a modified ICBM platform
• launch from a ship/submarine
• falsify missile telemetry to appear “North Korean”

This is the kind of plot the movie appears to dramatize.

Does the U.S. Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) really have ~61% success? - well.. yes and no.

Here are the real numbers: GBI test record (as of 2024): 19 successes out of 31 tests. This translates to ~61% success rate. And remember this is public Pentagon data.

In reality the rate is even lower.

To defend the U.S. homeland from incoming ICBMs launched by adversaries, Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system bases in Alaska and California track and target incoming missiles using “interceptor” missiles. The targeting of such incoming missiles is such a precise task that it is often described as “hitting a bullet with a bullet.” Presently, these defense systems have a limited testing record, with an approximate 55% success rate in tests. In reality, the system is designed to be only effective against small-scale threats and provides essentially zero protection against attack by a larger adversary such as Russia. There is no record of performance under real-world conditions.  Unlike in this film, where the success rate in tests is 61%, the actual success rate is 55%, much closer to a “coin toss.” In actual use, the rate could be lower. Also, the United States has already spent closer to $67 billion on its current missile defense system. (Source: A House of Dynamite’: Minute-By-Minute Watch-Along Guide / Center for Arms Control and Proliferation)

Here is one sobering reality - the system was designed ONLY for North Korea / Iran (small arsenals).

It was never meant for Russia or China.

So yes — the movie’s figure is accurate for what GBI can do but it deliberately exaggerates the GBI success rate to match the official statistic under "ideal conditions" and for the weakest of the adversaries that US has.

Now, let us ask the real question:

What about the real threat: RUSSIA

The answer may not be something that we like.

Nevertheless, let us state it as clearly as we can:

While GBIs are designed to counter "rogue state" attacks, a strategic launch would likely overwhelm the limited number of interceptors available.

Also, the current U.S. ground-based missile defense systems have a history of performance issues, with reliability concerns raised by experts. 

It could be argued that GBI was deliberately designed not to threaten China's or Russia’s deterrent. For, if the U.S. built a serious anti-Chinese or Russian missile shield, Russia would massively expand its arsenal, triggering an extremely unaffordable arms race.

Russian strategic missiles are engineered specifically to defeat U.S. missile defenses. Through hypersonic speeds, unpredictable trajectories, and unconventional launch vectors, these systems bypass every American interception layer. In their current state, U.S. defenses cannot stop them, making the Russian arsenal uniquely optimized to penetrate American protective shields.

Here is a quick and succinct Capabilities Table for Russian Strategic Weapons.

Since we are looking at the threats to the United States. Let us evaluate all the options that the three main adversaries - Russia, North Korea and China - have.

Could the U.S. stop a Russian nuclear strike today? No.

This mix is designed to overwhelm every layer of U.S. missile defense. Even in the most optimistic scenario - a scenario where America somehow shoots down 100 incoming missiles (something it currently cannot do).

Yet, more than 1,000 warheads would still get through.

The sheer volume, speed, and unpredictability of Russia’s arsenal make interception effectively impossible at present.

European and Western Insanity

So when US and Europe plan war on Russia and term China as adversaries so openly and blatantly, one needs to evaluate the sanity of this approach.

Here are some questions for us and the world:

• How sane do you think those set of actions from Europe and US are? Specifically in the way they are targeting Russia via Ukraine and pushing it into a corner.
• If Russia wipes out Europe what will be the American reply?

Quite obviously there is a huge gap between rhetoric, military capability, and nuclear reality.

So, let’s break it down without ideology, just pure strategic logic.

Why? Because:

• Russia can annihilate all of Europe in under 20 minutes
• And cripple the U.S. within 30 minutes
• With weapons the West openly admits it cannot intercept

Throughout the Cold War and thereafter, global stability has rested on one principle: Don’t corner a nuclear superpower to a point where it has no conventional alternatives left to safeguard its sovereignty.

That simple and sane logic has been thrown out of the window in the recent years.

NATO’s current behavior violates exactly that principle so blatantly that the only way to characterize it is INSANITY!

So the question is why does the West gamble with Russia in the manner that it is doing?

ERROR #1: The belief that Russia will never escalate to nuclear use

The lingering Cold War myth claims: “Russia will avoid nuclear war because it wants to survive.”

But this ignores Russia’s actual doctrine, which explicitly states: nuclear weapons may be used to prevent a decisive defeat.

It ignores repeated Russian warnings that nuclear use is possible if NATO enters Ukraine.

It overlooks that Russia possesses the largest nuclear stockpile in the world and the most advanced delivery systems, including hypersonics and doomsday weapons.

ERROR #2: The belief that U.S. soil is safe

Many Americans still think like it’s 1995—imagining major war as something that happens “somewhere else.”

But today’s reality is radically different.

The U.S. homeland is no longer protected by distance or geography.

Despite this unprecedented vulnerability, American politicians continue to behave as if they’re operating in a risk-free environment, treating global conflict like a theoretical exercise or a video game.

The danger is real, immediate, and no longer distant.

ERROR #3: Europe believes the U.S. will ‘save’ it

This is the most dangerous illusion of all.

If Russia launches a nuclear strike on Europe, tactical or strategic, the United States is forced into a binary choice: escalate into nuclear retaliation or stand down and accept the collapse of NATO’s credibility.

Option A — Retaliate with nukes: A U.S. nuclear strike on Russia would trigger overwhelming Russian retaliation. American cities would be targeted, resulting in devastation on a scale that ends the United States as a functioning nation. This outcome makes such an escalation politically and strategically impossible for any U.S. administration.

Option B — Do nothing militarily (issue threats, sanctions, etc.): If the U.S. refuses to respond to a Russian nuclear strike, Europe is effectively sacrificed. NATO collapses, American credibility evaporates, and U.S. allies worldwide lose faith. This marks the beginning of a profound American retreat from global leadership and the dismantling of the post-war international order.

In both scenarios, the U.S. cannot “save” Europe. Ultimately, Europe’s survival or destruction rests in its own hands. Not Washington’s strategic choices.

Now let us evaluate the scenario that is very critical now.

Scenario: Russia launches a nuclear or overwhelming conventional strike on Europe

Russia launches a nuclear or overwhelming conventional strike on Europe, triggering a cascading geopolitical collapse, forcing the U.S. into impossible choices and reshaping global power permanently.

Here is an in depth evaluation.

Europe ceases to exist as a functioning civilization: In a full-scale nuclear exchange, Europe would cease to exist as a functioning civilization. Russia possesses the capability to obliterate every NATO military base, command-and-control center, power grid, industrial hub, and major city across Western Europe.

If escalation demanded it, Russia could also neutralize the UK and France’s nuclear forces in a first strike.

The reality is stark: Russia has the arsenal to completely depopulate and dismantle Western Europe, leaving no coherent society or state structure behind.

The U.S. does NOT launch a full nuclear retaliation: The United States would not launch a full nuclear retaliation.

The reason is simple: Russia’s surviving second-strike forces would still annihilate the U.S., and no American president will sacrifice 100 million citizens for Berlin or Warsaw.

Public opinion would never support a suicidal response on Europe’s behalf. Instead, the U.S. would likely issue strong condemnations, call emergency UN sessions, threaten further escalation, provide aid to surviving European states, reposition forces defensively, and possibly consider very limited nuclear options—though even that remains unlikely.

What Washington will not do is initiate a civilization-ending Armageddon.

U.S. global hegemony collapses: If Europe is destroyed, U.S. global hegemony collapses almost immediately.

The EU dissolves, NATO disintegrates, and the dollar-based financial system loses its anchor. In the resulting power vacuum, China emerges as the dominant global force, Russia becomes the primary security arbiter, and India rises sharply as the Global South seeks new leadership.

Meanwhile, the United States turns inward, becomes domestically unstable, suffers severe economic erosion, and loses international trust. In such a scenario, the Western-led world order (political, economic, and cultural) effectively comes to an end.

So why does the West continue targeting Russia?

Because U.S. and European policymakers operate on a set of dangerous myths.

Here are the myths laid out in a table.

The West is attempting to wage a conventional geopolitical contest against a nation that operates entirely through existential strategy.

This creates a profound mismatch, of civilizations, risk calculus, historical memory, and strategic mindset, leaving Western planners unprepared for the scale and depth of Russia’s approach to survival and conflict.

Why are West’s actions strategically insane

The West keeps forgetting one fundamental principle of great-power strategy:

Yet NATO continues to move in precisely that direction.

It supplies long-range missiles capable of striking deep into Russian territory to Ukraine. It supports covert operations that target assets inside Russia.

Western leaders openly debate sending troops, seek to choke off Russian energy revenues, and encourage attacks on Russia’s strategic industries through proxies. Some even speak casually about regime change in Moscow.

These actions follow a familiar historical pattern—the exact chain of escalatory steps that has triggered catastrophic wars in the past.

But unlike previous adversaries, Russia is not a conventional power that can be defeated and reorganized. It is a heavily armed nuclear state with explicit doctrines allowing first use.

Pushing such a power toward desperation is not strategy; it is civilizational suicide.

The fact is that both sides may be wrong!

So, then why are the Elites orchestrating this Global war?

If a nuclear confrontation erupts between the U.S.–EU bloc and Russia, the outcome is not hard to imagine.

It is simple arithmetic.

• Major European states will be wiped out.
• Large parts of the United States will vanish.
• Swathes of Russia will become uninhabitable.

Cities will evaporate. Economies will vanish. Civilizations will be fractured.
The world will be thrust into a dark age that humanity has not witnessed in recorded history.

So the real question is not: “Can the West defeat Russia?”

The real question is: “Why are Western elites still marching toward a scenario in which everyone loses?”

Why does a leadership class, supposedly rational, educated, informed, continue to push the world into a confrontation that they know will destroy the very societies they govern?

The answer is chilling.

For decades, the global elite tried to reshape humanity through psychological operations: behavioral engineering, cultural reprogramming, identity manipulation, controlled media, narratives of fear, guilt, shame, and compliance.

It worked for a while. But not enough.

• Billions of people remain outside their ideological reach
• Millions are rejecting their narratives
• Nations are rebelling
• Religions are resisting
• Civilizations are reawakening.

The World Economic Forum style vision of reorganizing humanity under a single technocratic paradigm is collapsing under its own arrogance.

So the elites appear to have concluded something unthinkable:

A nuclear war - carefully triggered, conveniently blamed, timed with precision - creates the perfect reset:

• A drastic reduction in global population.
• Collapse of existing nation-states.
• Elimination of competing civilizational centers.
• Absolute dependency on those who possess bunkers, food vaults, genetic banks, water reserves, and autonomous zones.
• A frightened, fragmented survivor population—easy to govern, easy to shape.

This is no longer the fantasy of conspiracy theorists. It is the logical endpoint of the rhetoric we have been hearing:

• “The world has too many people.”
• “We need a Great Reset.”
• “You will own nothing and be happy.”
• “Humanity is the problem.”
• “We must reduce carbon—meaning humans.”
• “Crisis is opportunity.”

A nuclear-triggered collapse becomes the ultimate “opportunity.”

From the Roman emperors enforcing a single creed through the Nicene doctrine, to the Caliphate’s vision of Dar al-Islam enveloping the earth, to the medieval Papacy’s dream of universal Christian dominion, to colonial empires civilizing the world by force, to modern technocrats dictating global norms: the same impulse has returned in its most destructive form.

This leads us directly to the deeper historical arc.

The long continuum of One World Power Structures from ancient times to the present.

Because what we are witnessing today is not new. It is the final, violent gasp of a very old ambition.

The One World Power Structures - A Historical Account

There has been an impulse toward global ideological control.

So let us analyze the progression of the "One World" forces and their ideological agenda.

Council of Nicaea and Christendom

What really were the Council of Nicaea (325 CE)?

Well, it was not merely a theological conference. It was indeed a political engineering project.

Emperor Constantine needed:

• a single definition of God,
• a single permitted doctrine,
• a single institutional structure, and
• a single authority able to unify the fractured Roman Empire.

Christianity up to that point was decentralized, diverse, and fluid. Closer to a family of sects than a monolith.

Nicaea changed that.

The Roman state needed imperial stability, and competing Christian sects were creating fragmentation, unrest, and rival centers of authority.

Doctrinal uniformity became the tool through which the empire could consolidate control, suppress dissent, and establish a single, state-approved version of Christianity.

By defining “orthodoxy” and branding alternatives as heresy, the councils helped transform a diverse spiritual landscape into a unified ideological pillar of imperial power.

In essence, theology served the deeper goal: strengthening and stabilizing the empire itself.

Constantine believed:

Thus Nicaea was the earliest state-backed attempt at global doctrinal monopoly.

The crushing of the spiritual and the sacred hitherto was comprehensive.

• Heresies declared illegal
• Alternative theologies (Arianism, Gnosticism, Marcionism, Adoptionism) outlawed
• Bishops appointed as imperial administrators
• The Church granted legal monopoly on “truth”

This created the template for centralized truth-authority.

We have explored this in an earlier newsletter as well:

Drishtikone Newsletter #338: Rules-Based Order and Righteousness Framework of Power

The Western Rules-Based Order is under threat. What is it anyway? And who is threatening it? How it is inspired by Biblical literature?

Drishtikone: Insightful Perspectives on Geopolitics and CultureDesh Kapoor

Later councils (Constantinople 381, Chalcedon 451, Carthage, Ephesus) continued the project: crushing dissent, centralizing doctrine, and expanding Church authority.

Now let us move to the next stage.

Islamic Universalism: Dar al-Islam & Dar al-Harb

Islamic political theology developed after the Roman-Christian model, but with an even more explicit global civilizational map.

Islam traditionally classifies the world into two spheres: 

1. dar al-Islam (meaning “the territory of Islam”), referring to regions governed by Islamic law, and 
2. dar al-harb (meaning “the territory of war”), describing lands that have neither made peace with dar al-Islam nor are under its authority. Often including territories that once belonged to it but were annexed by others as well.

Dar al-Islam or the territory of Islam can be defined as a -

• Territory where Islamic law prevails
• House of peace (as mandated by Islamic order - peace of any other spiritual or theological type is automatically understood as war) and Islamic religious order
• Goal: expansion until globally enforced

Dar al-Harb or the territory of war can be defined as a

• House of war; territory of non-Muslim rule
• Temporary, illegitimate, and destined to be subsumed under Islamic god’s rule

Dar al-Sulh / Dar al-‘Ahd is the intermediary between Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam in times when the latter cannot be enforced. So it is

• House of treaty or temporary truce
• A state of negotiated non-hostility, not equal legitimacy

This, you see, is the cosmic geopolitical framework of Islam.

It categorizes the entire planet into zones based on their relationship to a universal religious-political system.

Islamic universalism is the clearest pre-modern articulation of a world that must eventually be unified under one divinely sanctioned legal order.

It is not “global governance” in the modern sense, but it is universal governance rooted in theology.

Now, we move to the next stage - Papacy as an imperial force.

Medieval Europe: The Papal Dream of a Unified Christendom

After the fall of Rome:

• The Papacy claimed universal authority
• Kings were crowned by Popes
• Papal Bulls declared spiritual dominion over the whole world
• The Crusades were justified to “recover” lands “rightfully belonging to Christendom”

This was not merely religion.

It was a geo-ideological attempt at a universal structure of governance:

• Papacy as world arbiter
• Christendom as global legal-cultural order
• All non-Christian lands considered “pagan,” “empty,” or “awaiting civilization”

Documents like Unam Sanctam (1302) explicitly declared:

“Submission to the Roman Pontiff is necessary for the salvation of every human creature.”

That is universal authority—religious and political.

After Rome’s collapse, the Papacy stepped into the political vacuum and asserted unprecedented universal authority.

Popes began to crown kings, signaling that earthly power now required spiritual legitimacy from the Church.

This expansive authority became the foundation for Europe’s ideological expansionism.

The Crusades were framed not as wars of conquest but as holy missions to “recover” lands that the Church declared rightfully belonging to Christendom.

In this way, religious power was weaponized into geopolitical power, shaping the next millennium of global history.

Modern Secular Globalism: The New Soft Universalism

Today, the same pattern re-emerges under secular vocabulary.

Global institutions have been created to enforce a unified ideological framework across nearly every aspect of human life.

Through policy, regulation, funding, and narrative control, these organizations promote standardized norms on governance, culture, economics, education, and even personal identity.

What appears as global cooperation often functions as ideological synchronization, shaping societies to fit a single, centralized worldview rather than allowing diverse civilizational paths to flourish.

Every one of these institutions has had a role to play:

• UN system
• WHO, WEF, IMF, World Bank
• NATO (ideological expansion under “democracy”)
• EU technocracy
• U.S. foreign policy establishment
• ESG frameworks, climate governance, AI governance attempts
• Western academia as global “truth authority”

Values, much like earlier theological doctrines with similar hidden ambitions, are now promoted as universal truths.

This creates a modern, secular form of ecclesiastical authority that dictates what is morally acceptable across cultures.

Under the guise of universality, these values function as a new global creed, enforcing conformity while masking the same centralizing intentions that once drove religious orthodoxy.

• One model of economics
• One model of political legitimacy
• One model of gender/identity thought
• One model of environmental morality
• One model of “acceptable speech”
• One model of technology governance

Look carefully and you will realize that this is a post-religious continuation of the Nicene impulse.

1. Define orthodoxy: Establish a single, centralized ideological framework that determines what is officially “correct,” reducing diverse worldviews into one authorized narrative presented as universal truth.
2. Declare dissent heresy: Label any deviation, criticism, or alternative perspective as dangerous, extremist, or illegitimate, ensuring dissenters are socially, politically, or professionally punished into silence.
3. Enforce compliance globally: Use international institutions, regulations, media ecosystems, and economic pressure to standardize behavior across nations, compelling societies to adopt and obey the imposed ideological model.

The same civilizational structure, only repackaged.

The “One World Government”: is it a Fact or Fiction?

There is apparently no “secret cabal” controlling everything, although there is an understanding of a "Deep State" comprising of a loose group of elites in a hierarchical structure. We have attempted to look at this in our earlier newsletter.

What is the Deep State: Indepth Analysis Inside the Shadowy Web of Power, Control, and Profits

Dive into the shadowy world of the Deep State—its hidden structures, powerful networks, and the far-reaching impact on global events and control.

Drishtikone: Insightful Perspectives on Geopolitics and CultureDesh Kapoor

Anyhow, one thing is unmistakable - that there IS a civilizational pattern to this control fetish and infrastructure.

Let us do a structured analysis of the Civilizational control patterns.

This analysis is not borne out of conspiracy. It is an undeniable pattern of historical repetition.

The Asuric Distortion: Control Without Dharma

From a Dharmic civilizational perspective, the core problem is neither religion nor modernity.

It is the rise of an Asuric structure that cuts across both.

Centralization over pluralism: This structure manifests as centralization replacing pluralism, control overriding individual autonomy, and enforced conformity suppressing experiential truth.

Power over wisdom: It elevates power above wisdom, prioritizing domination instead of understanding.

Fear over freedom: and ultimately, it operates by cultivating fear rather than freedom, conditioning societies to obey rather than awaken.

These patterns (not labels like “ancient” or “modern”) reveal the true nature of the forces shaping global civilization today.

The Indic civilization, on the other hand, had a completely different formulation of the spiritual. It intertwined seeking, individual effort and wisdom with diversity of paths.

In Indic civilization:

• There is no central book.
• No central authority.
• No “Final Prophet.”
• No “One Correct Path.”
• No global conversion mission.
• No universal civilizational blueprint imposed on Earth.

Dharma accepts multiplicity, complexity, local variation, and personal realization.

This is why Dharmic cultures resist every imperial “One World” project. Whether religious or secular.

What the West today seeks through technocracy, and what Abrahamic systems sought through theology, are structurally similar:

This is the Asuric hunger for control disguised as salvation or progress.

We will now look at the world of elites. A world that craves for the "One World Order" where their writ dominates the world whether as a representation of an imaginary god or as the narrative of a global institution controlled by them.

Let us look at that now.

Epstein and his Evil

In this Benny Johnson video, Tucker Carlson discusses the Jeffrey Epstein case with Daryl Cooper.

Daryl shares something interesting - that the Epstein story is not shocking because of what Epstein did, but because of who protected him.

• Epstein’s case is shocking less for his crimes and more for who protected him at every step.
• From the start, local police investigations were compromised: Epstein was tipped off about raids, and his house was cleaned and computers removed before law enforcement arrived.
• Prosecutors who tried to pursue him seriously were pressured or reprimanded, signaling protection from higher up.
• Then–U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta secretly negotiated a federal non-prosecution agreement with Epstein’s lawyers.
• That deal granted total immunity to Epstein and total immunity to all accomplices, including those not yet identified, and resulted in key subpoenas being dropped.
• Because of this, the DOJ never collected most critical evidence, making today’s demand for “all the Epstein files” largely meaningless—many of those files don’t exist in government hands.
• Even after conviction, Epstein kept his passport, was not treated as a flight risk, and traveled abroad, including to Israel.
• He reportedly considered staying in Israel permanently, exploiting the fact that many Jewish offenders have avoided extradition there, suggesting he relied on a broader protective ecosystem.
• His abuse operation was systematic and industrial: Ghislaine Maxwell targeted vulnerable teenage girls—fatherless, poor, or from broken homes—under the guise of “massage” work.
• Those girls were then turned into recruiters of other minors, creating a pyramid-style trafficking network; they were coerced and manipulated children, not willing “prostitutes” as some media narratives implied.

This is gruesome and shocking as it is.

But the conversation goes into the deep end of another area: Dark Occult.

Or Satanism as the Christians call it.

Cooking Gore to Shock or to Satisfy?

Daryl and Tucker discuss about Spirit Cooking and Tony Podesta's home.

Spirit Cooking is a performance-art piece created in the 1990s by Serbian artist Marina Abramović, which later became controversial because its imagery, language, and ritual symbolism were interpreted by some as occult or “satanic.”

Abramović's Spirit Cooking began as a performance-art project (1996). She produced a book and art installation called Spirit Cooking with Essential Aphrodisiac Recipes. The “recipes” were written on walls using pig’s blood, not human blood.

These “recipes” included symbolic, provocative lines like:

• “Mix fresh breast milk with fresh sperm milk on earthquake nights.”
• “Cut the middle finger of your left hand. Eat the pain.”

Apparently, they are not literal instructions, but part of her decades-long body art tradition of using shock, ritual, and body symbolism.

Tony is an American lobbyist best known for founding the Podesta Group. He is the brother of former White House Chief of Staff John Podesta and was formerly one of Washington's most powerful lobbyists and fundraisers.

Tony Podesta’s home prominently displayed disturbing artwork—paintings of traumatized children, pieces themed around child molestation, and grotesque sculptures pairing children with demonic figures. These were showcased publicly at social events, not hidden.

In such a world, someone like Jeffrey Epstein would not seem monstrous or alien. Rather, he would seem familiar, even ordinary, because the underlying worldview already treats child and feminine suffering and dark symbolism as acceptable or worse, 'sophisticated'.

As we saw, Marina Abramović has consistently insisted that Spirit Cooking is performance art.

Apparently, an exploration of fear, mortality, the body, and the boundaries of discomfort, not an occult ritual.

According to her, the blood-like substances, sigil-like markings, and ritualistic gestures are metaphors meant to provoke reflection, not literal invocations.

Yet despite these disclaimers, the aesthetic of Spirit Cooking remains unmistakably steeped in the vocabulary of the occult. Its visual grammar openly draws from ritual forms, sacrificial imagery, cryptic scripts, and symbols associated with bodily fluids and transgressive acts.

Metaphor or not, the art’s surface language is one of darkness, violation, and inversion.

Gruesome meets Reality in Elite Circles

What makes this more unsettling is not simply the art itself, but who is drawn to it.

Events connected to Abramović have repeatedly attracted members of the political, corporate, and cultural elite—people with power, wealth, and influence.

These are not fringe artists or students; they are billionaires, diplomats, Hollywood icons, and high-ranking officials.

Their participation in spaces filled with mock corpses, infant-like effigies, blood motifs, and ritual-coded “recipes” using symbolic body parts raises important cultural and psychological questions.

Even if we accept that Spirit Cooking is “only art,” the symbolic universe it inhabits intersects heavily with themes of desecration, the inversion of innocence, the fetishization of harm, and ritual degradation.

These are not benign or neutral archetypes; they are historically associated with transgression, subversion, and the breaking of moral or sacred boundaries.

When such symbols become fashionable or sophisticated entertainment for the powerful, it suggests a deeper cultural.. rather a humanity shift.

A reversal in which darkness is aestheticized and the sacred is mocked, hollowed out, or inverted.

The line between symbolic transgression and actual exploitation disappeared, revealing the darker impulses behind elite fascination with these themes.

The Monstrous Aesthetic

What struck Tucker in that Epstein discussion (and what we want to pick up on) is not just the crimes but the aesthetic of the elite world:

• “Art” and performance centered on blood, mock corpses, infant effigies splattered in red, cryptic phrases about cutting oneself and drinking bodily fluids – Marina Abramović’s “spirit cooking” is one prominent example.
• Tony Podesta’s famous collection featuring images of abused or drugged-looking children, surreal sexualized monstrosities with children, etc – proudly hung in social spaces, not hidden away.

Even if we bracket the literal word “satanic,” what you see is:

That’s the same inversion one sees in Epstein: children as consumables, not beings; bodies and souls as material for leverage.

So yes – there’s a recognizable pattern of “dark energy”: an attraction to ritualized degradation as a mark of belonging to a certain power club.

Historic Battles of the Forces

The fact is that since late antiquity, a series of imperially backed religious projects have systematically attacked prior spiritual ecologies.

From Late Roman times onward:

• Pagan temples and philosophical schools in the Mediterranean were closed or destroyed as Christianity became state religion. The murder of Hypatia in Alexandria by a Christian mob is one symbolic episode of this broader pattern.
• In the Americas, Africa, and Asia, Christian missions were tightly bound to imperial expansion. Missions often saw indigenous spiritual systems as “idolatry” or “demonic,” and worked to suppress them.
• For Native Americans, church-run boarding/residential schools (19th–20th c.) intentionally erased language, ritual, and identity. Recent US and Canadian investigations explicitly describe this as cultural genocide, targeting indigenous spirituality and ways of life

Christian projects, specifically when fused with empire and racial hierarchy, systematically:

• Destroyed shrines and sacred sites
• Criminalized or demonized native spiritual traditions and rituals
• Kidnapped children and forcibly worked to “convert” their consciousness

So what was underway under these Christian projects?

Cutting the lineages of wisdom, seizing the children, breaking the feminine and the elders.

In India and parts of Central–West Asia, Islamic conquests did something similar in many phases:

• The great university of Nalanda was attacked and largely destroyed around 1193 by forces under Bakhtiyar Khilji, with its libraries burned and monks killed or scattered. Ditto for many others like Takshila and many ashrams and temples. Entire wisdom was rooted out not by another wisdom but by gruesome violence that targeted the Spiritual and the Feminine.
• The destruction that started in 712 AD by Mohammad Bin Qasim to Nader Shah in in 1738-1740 - the pattern was no different. That pattern, modus operandi and the ruthless and horrific violence continues till today whether it was during the Direct Action Day, the Partition or the Operation Searchlight.
• Lands - from the modern day Persia, to Afghanistan to Indonesia to Malaysia - that had strong Dharmic and spiritual traditions and consciousness, were stripped off the entire lineage. Most of them are now civilizational deserts.

What is this Dark Energy?

If we strip away labels and look at functions, you see a recurring triad:

1. Control of bodies
   • Women’s sexuality is tightly policed or brutally violated; female spiritual roles are downgraded or demonized.
   • Children are taken, indoctrinated, abused (from boarding schools to, in the extreme, Epstein-type exploitation).
2. Control of knowledge
   • Burning libraries, destroying temples and monasteries, suppressing originally spiritual and profound but “heretical” for exclusive fanatical texts.
   • Outlawing or stigmatizing techniques of direct inner realization (tantra, shamanic practices, indigenous medicine).
3. Control of access to the sacred
   • Mediating the divine only through a sanctioned priesthood and scripture, delegitimizing all other gateways.

The pattern has been similar and unmistakable. Whether under a cross, crescent, or modern “secular” technocratic elite, the energy is similar:

Sit back and think again - running the entire story from the ancient to the modern times.

Seen this way, Epstein-world is just the late-stage, decadent version of this same consciousness: a ruling layer that no longer even pretends to honor the sacred, but openly inverts it.

Many esoteric traditions — from certain Theosophical currents to deeper layers of Indic cosmology — describe a universe populated by forces beyond ordinary perception.

They speak of beings devoid of empathy, races or entities from non-human realms, and presences that feed on fear, confusion, or lower states of consciousness.

These teachings frame existence as more than a physical struggle; they portray a subtle conflict over the human mind, agency, and soul-development.

In this view, humanity is not merely living in history but participating in an unseen contest between energies that elevate consciousness and those that drain or distort it.

In that sense, the “alien tribe” metaphor is not incompatible with Hindu cosmology.

Asuras are not born of Mother Earth; they are born of a different impulse - anti-embodied, anti-sacred, anti-light.

Deva vs Asura

Let us go and poke into the Hindu traditions to see if we can see something that points to this battle of the two forces, which clearly has seen the upper hand of the dark forces of exclusive religiosity.

Deva vs Asura dichotomy is not just “god vs demon” in a Marvel sense.

The conception of "Good vs Evil" necessarily involved interpretation and therefore plays up the interpreter being the central authority of arbitration as opposed to establishing an objective form of duality.

So how have these two concepts of Devas and Asuras, been understood in the scriptures?

Let's see -

• Deva represent the forces that uphold ṛta (cosmic order), protect the vulnerable, and honor knowledge. Manifestation of Dharma.
• Asura, on the other hand, represent forces of domination, addiction to power and control, hatred of light and transparency.

The battles that have been touted as "mythical" are existential battles that are being waged every moment in a metaphysical realm that encapsulates our physicality.

We may, therefore, see the physical manifestation of those battles, say in the form of rape and murder of Hypatia or the targeting of the Bengali feminine in 1946 and 1971, but the real war is being waged at an almost invisible metaphysical level.

Humanity keeps returning to the same delusion:

This is the origin of every totalitarian impulse.

Every “One World Project” ultimately collapses under its own weight, because unity enforced through power is inherently unstable.

True planetary harmony will come not from uniformity, but from conscious pluralism.

The Dharmic realization that truth is not a monopoly, and humanity is not a flock.

Protracted Kurukshetra

If we strip away the noise, a Hindu/Indic-friendly formulation might be:

• Humanity is in a protracted Kurukṣetra where:
  • The lineages of direct realization (yoga, tantra, shamanism, indigenous traditions, dharmic paths) have been systematically attacked.
  • Power structures built on domination, exploitation, and desecration have become the “normal” elites of the age.
  • Epstein-style networks are not an aberration but a naked exposure of how far down the Asuric spiral parts of the ruling class have fallen.

The real task before us is far larger than exposing Epstein, Podesta, Marina, or any other individual figure.

These people are not isolated monsters. They are symptoms of a deeper civilizational rupture. The problem is the long arc of cultural decay that allowed power, secrecy, and spiritual inversion to merge into one ecosystem.

The work ahead, therefore, is threefold.

First, we must revive living, diverse, plural spiritual lineages — traditions that honor life, dignity, and the inner journey. When these lineages thrive, societies regain moral clarity and the individual becomes resistant to manipulation by manufactured “elite culture.”

Second, we must protect women (in reality, the feminine) and children, not merely as vulnerable groups but as carriers of future consciousness. Their safety, autonomy, and spiritual anchoring determine the health of an entire civilization. A society that cannot protect its women/feminine and children cannot protect its soul.

And finally, we must design cultural, educational, and technological structures that prevent any single class — political, religious, or corporate — from centralizing knowledge (along with the distorted forms of the sacred - a la Ravan) and weaponizing it. Wisdom must be decentralized, safeguarded, and made resilient so it cannot be captured by those who seek power through fear, secrecy, and distortion.

This is the true corrective path.