Latest

The understanding of “God” in the Yogic lineage and in Hinduism (its derivative) has never been of a person or entity. It has always been of the infinite, immanent and eternal consciousness. This eternal consciousness has been understood (and experienced by the Sages and Rishis) as changeless yet dynamic, both

When the focus has no outlet, no fall back, it forges ahead in one direction. When the singer closes her eyes, it is not because closed eyes help the throat muscles, but because in that state she and music are one. A visually impaired man has no way to engage

Three paradigms of how spiritual beings have engaged with society in India - Shiva, Krishna, and Ram. One rejected the society unless someone with singular devotion (Saptarishis) or love (Parvati) approached. Second, engaged fully with society and worked within the laws but rejected the norms. Third, lived within the norms

He was making food for both the sides in Mahabharat. Just enough. Not more, not less. No matter how many died - hundreds, thousands - the food was just enough. The Udupi king was the one who was responsible for the food. How did he get it so right? Before

Do you want all or nothing at all? Will you be any different when you done either way? When Sage Yajnavalkya was asked “What is God?” He said Neti, Neti. What you can observe is not the Divine. So, one started discarding everything that was observable. The body, the emotions,