The Epsteinian World of Evil
The Epstein revelations have cast a question mark over our collective consciousness. How do we process them? How do we move forward from here? When we all know we live in a dystopian world at our doorsteps, how do we even engage? A look at the situation.
A Shift?
In a quiet valley surrounded by mountains, there once stood a great hall of mirrors.
One winter, the elders of the valley opened the doors and said, “Come and see.”
Inside were millions of fragments — papers, letters, pictures, records — scattered like fallen leaves after a storm. The people walked in, and as they gazed into the mirrors, they saw not monsters but reflections of power without restraint. They saw how wealth had shielded cruelty. How influence had softened consequences. How silence had lasted longer than it should have.
Some trembled.
Some grew angry.
Some felt as if the sky itself had cracked.
In a corner of the hall, a young monk sat quietly, watching the crowd. A man approached him and said, “Is this a revelation? Is this justice? Or is it theater?”
The monk replied, “When a mask falls, it is not yet transformation. It is only exposure.”
“But why show us this?” the man asked. “Why open the doors at all?”
The monk smiled gently. “Sometimes doors are opened not from virtue, but because they can be opened without fear.”
The man grew uneasy. “Then nothing changes?”
The monk picked up a fallen wooden block from a child’s game on the floor — a tower once standing, now collapsed.
“See this?” he said. “When a structure rots from within, it does not fall from thunder. It falls from imbalance. But before it falls, the cracks become visible.”
The crowd outside debated paintings, emails, associations, rumors, and accusations. Some sought villains in every shadow. Others dismissed everything as an illusion. Parents worried for their children. Citizens questioned institutions. Anger flared and faded like wind through dry grass.
The monk rose and walked to the doorway.
“Evil,” he said softly, “is not defeated by frenzy. Nor by fear. Nor by imagination untethered to truth.”
“It is revealed when power forgets consequence. And it collapses when people refuse to surrender their clarity.”
The valley did not change overnight. The mirrors did not vanish. But something quieter began — a deeper watchfulness, a sharper discernment, a refusal to worship power.
And in that stillness, hope returned — not loud, not triumphant — but steady.
Like a mountain that does not move when storms pass over it.
SUPPORT DRISHTIKONE
In an increasingly complex and shifting world, thoughtful analysis is rare and essential. At Drishtikone, we dedicate hundreds of dollars and hours each month to producing deep, independent insights on geopolitics, culture, and global trends. Our work is rigorous, fearless, and free from advertising and external influence, sustained solely by the support of readers like you. For over two decades, Drishtikone has remained a one-person labor of commitment: no staff, no corporate funding — just a deep belief in the importance of perspective, truth, and analysis. If our work helps you better understand the forces shaping our world, we invite you to support it with your contribution by subscribing to the paid version or a one-time gift. Your support directly fuels independent thinking. To contribute, choose the USD equivalent amount you are comfortable with in your own currency. You can head to the Contribute page and use Stripe or PayPal to make a contribution.
The Epstein Menace
The release of the Epstein files in early 2026, comprising over 3.5 million pages of documents, emails, photos, videos, and investigative materials from the Department of Justice, has shattered illusions for many. As mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act signed into law on November 19, 2025, these disclosures culminated in a massive tranche on January 30, 2026, including more than 3 million pages, 2,000 videos, and 180,000 images.
This is where you can access all of them: DOJ site for Epstein Files
An interesting way to access the Epstein files is via a new app called Jmail.
Luke Igel
As the per the latest reports, the Department of Justice is done releasing all the files.
The Justice Department said it has released “all” files tied to dead sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein, according to a letter sent by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche to lawmakers on Saturday night. (Source: Mediaite)
This means that roughly 50% of all records will never be released.
Epstein files document dump, records a harrowing allegation from a woman who contacted the bureau in July 2019. She told the FBI that in approximately 1996 an unknown man abducted her from her home and that she later regained consciousness in what she believed was Jeffrey Epstein’s Florida mansion. According to the intake summary, the caller alleged that when she woke up she found herself in the presence of disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein and music mogul Shawn Carter, better known as Jay‑Z.
The same report states that she claimed to have been drugged and to have suffered similar abductions and assaults on multiple occasions in “lavish indoor environments,” with Epstein allegedly involved in some incidents.
Deep Ponerological Existence
Andrew Łobaczewski was a Polish psychiatrist who endured the horrors of Nazi occupation and Soviet communism.
He wrote his seminal work titled Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes. It was a product of his clandestine research in the 1960s under communist rule.
Interestingly, the original manuscript was destroyed by the secret police, but Łobaczewski reconstructed it from memory after fleeing to the United States in the 1980s. Published posthumously in English in 2006, the book treats evil not as a metaphysical abstraction but as a clinical phenomenon, akin to a disease that infects societies.
Łobaczewski coined "ponerology" from the Greek poneros (evil), proposing it as an interdisciplinary science drawing from psychology, sociology, philosophy, and history to study the genesis of evil at all scales—from individual acts to macrosocial tyrannies.
He argued that societies oscillate between "happy times" of prosperity and "unhappy times" of crisis. During happy times, privileged classes suppress knowledge of psychopathological influences in power corridors. But in crises, pathological individuals—primarily psychopaths, narcissists, and those with character disorders—exploit chaos to ascend.
His most critical assertion was that about 4-6% of the population exhibits primary psychopathy: a genetic or early developmental lack of empathy, conscience, and remorse. These individuals are driven by self-interest, power, and control, viewing others as objects to manipulate. They don't experience moral qualms; instead, they mimic normal emotions to blend in. Intelligent and charismatic, they excel in competitive environments like politics, finance, media, and intelligence agencies, where moral restraint hinders "success."
Check this excellent essay out on Łobaczewski's work.
Michael Rectenwald
Łobaczewski warned that societies do not decay merely from flawed policies or ideological mistakes. They decay when a small minority of psychologically disordered individuals rise into positions of power and quietly reshape institutions in their own image.
Psychopaths, he argued, recognize one another. They form networks. They promote loyalty over virtue. They protect those who share their moral emptiness while systematically pushing out the conscientious, the empathetic, and the principled. Over time, this concentration of pathology produces what he called a pathocracy — rule by the pathological over the normal.
Cruelty is reframed as pragmatism. Conscience is mocked as weakness. Those who question the system are discredited or neutralized. The machinery of governance continues to function, but its moral core has been hollowed out.
Viewed through that lens, the Epstein scandal appears less like an isolated criminal enterprise and more like a symptom of structural rot. His operations did not survive because of brilliance alone; they survived because systems repeatedly failed to hold him accountable.
The lenient 2008 plea deal. The destruction or disappearance of evidence. The years of ignored warnings from victims. The slow pace of accountability. These are not random accidents — they are institutional responses that raise serious questions about elite insulation.
Łobaczewski would not interpret this as supernatural evil. He would see it as systemic pathology protecting itself. When power networks prioritize mutual protection over moral accountability, corruption metastasizes. Exploitation becomes shielded. Reputation replaces justice. Influence overrides law.
Societies collapse not because darkness is dramatic, but because it is normalized. When institutions cease to restrain the ruthless, the ruthless begin to define the institution. And once that shift occurs, the danger is no longer one individual’s crimes — it is a structure that quietly adapts to enable them.
One interesting tidbit that aligns with the many conspiracies that have often circulated about the elite's involvement.
Here is George W. Bush, seated on the floor of what looks like the Oval Office. He is holding a small paper airplane, and several other paper airplanes are scattered around him with fallen Jenga towers. The desk behind him resembles the Resolute Desk, and the red chair reinforces the presidential setting.
This was found in Jeffrey Epstein’s New York residence after his arrest.
It is a perfect metaphor for the internal moral collapse of the US.
The Atrocities and the Abuse
School photography company Lifetouch has also come under deeper scrutiny because of its ownership by an Epstein associate.
One content creator posted an Instagram Reel on Feb. 12 warning parents about schools that use the company and advising them to opt out their kids from the photos. It has 39,000 views to date. On X, in a post with more than 100,000 views as of Feb. 13, a user reiterated the claim that the company is in the files and wrote, "They keep a database of all the digital photos of kids and their personal info." The discussion appears to stem from the ownership of Lifetouch's parent company, Shutterfly, which is owned by private equity firm Apollo Global Management. Leon Black, the former CEO of Apollo Global Management, is named in the Epstein files. (Source: What we know about Lifetouch, school photos and the Epstein files / USA Today)
The company is now facing district investigations and canceled school photo days over rumors about Jeffrey Epstein files.
There's a thread on r/teachers about - https://www.reddit.com/r/Teachers/comments/1r2cnra/picture_day_canceled_over_epstein_rumors_i_feel/
Also, Texas parents have raised concerns about it - Houston Chronicle
The thing that worries parents is that not only does the company have all the photographs of the kids but they also have names, phone numbers, and addresses of each child!
Parents have raised concerns about the security of their children's photos stored by the school photography company Lifetouch.
This anxiety is fueled by the belief that the contents of the newly released Epstein files reveal torture and abuse of a scale that is difficult to comprehend. Some observers suggest that older allegations, which were previously dismissed as coming from conspiracy theorists or "deranged" individuals, are now being viewed as more credible in light of the new information.
They point to an uncanny pattern between the old claims and the details emerging from the Epstein documents.
Here are some examples.
Babies were dismembered? Feet were cut? Here is a testimony of an Epstein victim
An email contained within the Epstein document releases reportedly references an allegation that two foreign girls were murdered and buried in the hills near Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico.
Newly released internal emails show Jeffrey Epstein’s staff coordinating the delivery of a graphic artwork titled Massacre of the Innocents—a painting depicting the killing of infants—to his private ranch, highlighting his unsettling fixation on violent imagery disguised as ‘fine art.’
An anonymous male accuser has alleged that George H. W. Bush raped him during an incident on a yacht in 2000.
He further alleges he witnessed a child being torn apart and having their intestines pulled out aboard the yacht, and that people on the yacht ate the intestinal waste.
These graphic claims are described as ritualistic or satanic in nature and appear in a complaint filed with the New York Police Department’s Child Exploitation unit.
An email correspondence which contains the purported Epstein victim's account notes “Thanks M, I didn't realize Bush raped him too. Ok.” More details about the victim are attached in the same document. “While on this yacht he witnessed African American males having sex with white blonde females, all of whom were bleeding during intercourse,” the document notes. An email correspondence which contains the purported Epstein victim's account notes “Thanks M, I didn't realize Bush raped him too. Ok.” More details about the victim are attached in the same document. “While on this yacht he witnessed African American males having sex with white blonde females, all of whom were bleeding during intercourse,” the document notes. (Source: George Bush in Epstein Files: Shocking allegations emerge; ‘raped him too’ / Hindustan Times)
In August 2009, Gabriela Rico Jiménez, a 21-year-old Mexican model, was filmed outside the Fiesta Inn hotel in Monterrey, Mexico, in a state of extreme panic. She had just attended a private party described as an elite modeling event attended by prominent businessmen and politicians.
In the video, she screamed that attendees were "eating people" and "eating human flesh," crying out, "They ate a person. I was unaware. I wanted freedom.
Check the video out.
This X Post by Elizabeth Lane, shares details of what the ex-Presidents have unleashed. She discusses how other figures like Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, and Donald Trump are also referenced in various contexts within the released materials.
The files suggest Epstein’s network reached into high-level financial, intelligence, and political circles, but the most extreme claims remain disputed and unproven.
So what do we actually have in the Epstein files so far?
— ELIZABETH LANE (@imelizabethlane) February 1, 2026
We have serious allegations pointing directly at George H. W. Bush. Being a rapist (Bush Sr.) and the Bush family sit at the center of what many researchers describe as one of the most entrenched power networks in modern… pic.twitter.com/OM8frdm237
When men, women and children - even infants - were raped, dismembered, hacked and killed; as impossible as it may seem there have been some survivors from this immoral and inhuman enterprise.
Now, the why?
Revelation of Method: The "Karmic" Hack by the Immoral
People have asked why the Epstein files have been revealed now. One group related it to the concept of "Revelation of Method". What is it?
Here is a quotation from Michael Hoffman's book "Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare."
The release of the Epstein files should not automatically be interpreted as an act of noble transparency. Transparency implies accountability, reform, and consequence. What the public has largely witnessed instead is exposure without structural change. And that distinction matters.
Some analysts immersed in the nuances of occult argue that such disclosures resemble the “Revelation of the Method” (ROM).
So, per this interpretation, the release is not confession but theater.
Proof of depravity is dangled before the public as a test of resolve. Outrage surges briefly, social media erupts, commentators rage — and then attention shifts.
The NFL game begins. The next political scandal dominates headlines. Streaming queues refill. The moment passes.
The implicit message, according to this view, is chilling: “We showed you. You saw it. And nothing changed.”
Łobaczewski’s concept of pathocracy deepens this analysis. If individuals lacking empathy cluster within power structures, exposure does not shame them — it may embolden them. Psychopaths are not restrained by moral embarrassment. Public revelation can amplify arrogance rather than deter misconduct. When consequences fail to materialize, the signal received at the top is not caution but confirmation.
Examples often cited by critics include pre-pandemic simulations such as Event 201 and cultural imagery preceding major crises, such as 9/11.
The exercise focused on practical challenges: economic disruption, misinformation, supply chain breakdowns, travel and trade restrictions, and the need for stronger coordination between public and private sectors.
In full transparency, Event 201 itself does not appear in the Epstein files.
They have, however, highlighted emails and invitations from around 2015 that connected Jeffrey Epstein to discussions on pandemic preparedness. One such email invited both Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein to a Geneva conference titled “Preparing for Pandemics: Lessons Learned for More Effective Responses.”
The event reportedly involved figures such as Terje Rød-Larsen, then President of the International Peace Institute, along with individuals connected to global health institutions including the World Health Organization, United Nations officials, and the Red Cross.
In the Epstein saga, earlier episodes — the 2019 jail death, the Maxwell conviction — conditioned public attention long before later document releases intensified scrutiny.
When elites appear insulated from consequence, power begins to resemble inevitability. That perception erodes hope. And once citizens internalize the belief that corruption is omnipotent, submission follows—not through force, but through psychological exhaustion.
One may be tempted to see the whole Epstein saga as mere exposure without accountability, which is damning enough and far from being a reflection of the honesty of the system.
It is, ultimately, dominance masquerading as disclosure.
Kids by the Plane Loads?
This is the verified account “Botin Kurdistan” alleging that Turkey was a major contributor to Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. It claims that Turkish state actors or individuals sold thousands of underage children to Epstein for $200 million and asserts that most victims were Kurdish.
Interestingly, here is a report referencing DW Türkçe. It states that Turkey’s Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office launched an investigation into allegations that children from Turkey were trafficked to Epstein’s island. The investigation reportedly followed a social media post by opposition MP Turhan Çömez, citing the release of U.S. Department of Justice documents.
We all know that the truth will never be the outcome of any investigation. What was done should have been unearthed when it had happened. That a country's establishment delibrately shipped plane loads full of children and infants for abuse is the most damning metaphor of our times.
Kids for Abuse was the export! For money. And there were "consumers" of kids and infants waiting with bated cunning to devour them.
Why?
Virality from the Blood of Scared Infants
To harvest a chemical called adrenochrome.
In February 2019, Infowars featured a segment on adrenochrome, linking it to the Clinton Foundation via epipen manufacturers, and to the highly controversial “young blood” transfusion startup Ambrosia. A month later, adrenochrome “documentaries” began to emerge on YouTube, followed by many smaller copycat productions, helping form a searchable foundation for the current day conspiracy. (Source: The Dark Virality of a Hollywood Blood-Harvesting Conspiracy / Wired)
The interest in "young blood" is not just the part of conspiracies. Start-ups are looking at it as a treatment for ageing.
As depressing as this whole plan is on how elites treat living human being, it also sets the bottomline for where the world is currently.
Epstein and the Modi Government
There has been an uproar by the opposition and some unscrupulous social media activists have made "wink wink" innuendo-laden videos in an attempt to implicate Indian PM Modi in the Epstein case.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is mentioned indirectly and in a limited, unsubstantiated way. There is no evidence of direct contact, meetings, or involvement by Modi himself. Key references include:
Emails involving Indian businessman Anil Ambani (described by some as close to Modi, which is quite a stretch for any serious Indian political observer) in which Ambani discussed potential connections or assistance related to Modi's activities, such as his 2017 visit to Washington, DC, or other diplomatic matters.
A 2017 email from Epstein to an associate claiming that "the Indian Prime Minister Modi took advice. and danced and sang in Israel for the benefit of the US president."
This appears to refer to Modi's historic 2017 visit to Israel, with Epstein boastfully (and falsely) implying influence or advice.
The Indian opposition being a group lacking in basic English grammar as well as emotional IQ have taken this literally and started abusing the Indian PM via AI generated fakes.
Very appropriately, India's Ministry of External Affairs dismissed this as "trashy ruminations of a convicted criminal" with no credibility, and no verified documents show any actual link or advice from Epstein to Modi.
Here is a typical article by the leftist and discredited Indian rag named "The Wire", which plays the usual "framing trick" that conspiratorial media tabloids usually employ.
By placing Epstein’s name, Modi’s name, Trump/Bannon, and a photograph of Trump and Modi in close proximity, the article creates a psychological linkage.
This technique is common in adversarial political environments:
- Take a known villain (Epstein).
- Highlight that he attempted outreach.
- Emphasize proximity.
- Let implication do the work.
The burden of proof must remain clear:
- Attempted outreach ≠ meeting.
- Discussion ≠ agreement.
- Mention in correspondence ≠ involvement.
If media narratives blur those distinctions, they move from reporting into insinuation.
That doesn’t mean journalists shouldn’t ask questions. It means the line between inquiry and implication must remain sharp — especially when reputational damage is involved.
Now, let us move to the case of Hardeep Singh Puri.
Hardeep Singh Puri (India's Union Minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas in the Modi government, former diplomat and UN ambassador) is mentioned more substantially:
- Multiple email exchanges between Puri and Epstein from around June 2014 to June 2017 (after Epstein's 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor).
- Discussions often centered on introducing or facilitating connections, such as inviting LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman to India to explore digital/internet business opportunities, and sharing details on Indian government initiatives like "Digital India" and "Make in India" to attract investment.
This is what Al Jazeera reports.
In the documents are email exchanges between Puri and Epstein that began in June 2014, with the sex offender writing to Puri about Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, and arranging a visit by Hoffman to India. Following an exchange of emails, Puri wrote a detailed pitch for investment opportunities in India to Epstein and Hoffman, laying out economic plans in India under the newly elected Modi government, and urging Hoffman to visit. Documents also show Puri met Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse on at least three occasions: February 4, 2015; January 6, 2016; and May 19, 2017. (Source: "Modi to Kevin Rudd: How Epstein files set off a storm far beyond the US" / Al Jazeera)
Records indicate Puri met Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse on at least three (possibly up to five) occasions: February 4, 2015; January 6, 2016; and May 19, 2017.
Some emails show Puri referring to Epstein as a contact or "friend" in professional contexts, tied to his post-UN role with organizations like the International Peace Institute (where Epstein had connections via figures like Terje Rod-Larsen).
Puri has publicly acknowledged these interactions, describing them as strictly professional (networking for investment and economic ties), limited in number, and unrelated to Epstein's crimes.
In this testy exchange with Arnab, Hardeep Singh Puri clarifies on the allegations.
Whither Goes Humanity?
Drawing a parallel between the behaviors exposed in the Epstein revelations and the potential for broader societal control by the powerful is a speculative exercise that connects documented elite misconduct with hypothetical future scenarios.
The Epstein files have provided extensive documentation of a network where immense wealth and influence were allegedly used to facilitate the systematic sexual abuse of vulnerable individuals. This case demonstrates how elites could operate with a perceived impunity, leveraging their connections to evade accountability for extended periods.
The core of this dynamic is a power imbalance, in which the influential can exploit those with less power, shielded by their status and social circles. This creates a system where the abuse of "common people" is not just possible but can be sustained through a culture of silence and complicity.
Just see that if elites are capable of such depravity in secret, they might also be capable of implementing large-scale systems of control under the guise of public health or safety. After all, three things that the world’s ruling elites - political and business are devoid of are humanity, feeling and basic morality.
If measures such as lockdowns, mandates, and digital surveillance were seen not as temporary emergency responses but as a test run for a more permanent stratification of society then the future of humanity could be akin to the scenario in “Hunger Games”.
The future of "Hunger Games"- style reality would be a society in which the powerful not only live by different rules but also actively manage and control the general population. The "common people" would become a resource to be managed, their freedoms curtailed for the benefit and stability of the elite class. This vision sees the pandemic response as a proof-of-concept for technocratic control that could be deployed for other purposes, solidifying a hierarchy that mirrors the exploitation seen in the Epstein network but on a global scale.
While this connection is a matter of speculation rather than proven fact, it taps into a deep-seated public distrust. The Epstein files have confirmed that the worst fears about some elites are not entirely unfounded, which fuels suspicion about their motives in other arenas, from public health to economics. The pattern is not one of direct evidence but of perceived capability: if they are willing to do that behind closed doors, what might they be willing to do in the open when given the power?
Let us look at the parallels specifically.
- Inequality: Like Epstein's victims from marginalized groups, Panem's districts represent the exploited masses, while the Capitol hoards wealth—mirroring today's 1% vs. 99%
- Control and Surveillance: The Games enforce submission through spectacle and fear, akin to how COVID measures (or broader surveillance capitalism) could be seen as tools for compliance. Epstein's blackmail tactics echo Panem's use of personal leverage to maintain order.
- Elite Indifference: If elites can overlook (or partake in) abuse in private parties, extrapolating to a world where they orchestrate mass suffering isn't a huge leap—think wars, sanctions, or climate inaction that disproportionately harm the global poor.
Could this become "reality"?
Yes!
Specifically, in extreme inequality scenarios, like unchecked climate collapse or AI-driven job loss, societies could fracture into elite enclaves vs. controlled masses.
We have to remember that in this case, we are looking at The Hunger Games as an allegory, not necessarily as a prophecy.
Comments ()