Latest

Three paradigms of how spiritual beings have engaged with society in India - Shiva, Krishna, and Ram. One rejected the society unless someone with singular devotion (Saptarishis) or love (Parvati) approached. Second, engaged fully with society and worked within the laws but rejected the norms. Third, lived within the norms

He was making food for both the sides in Mahabharat. Just enough. Not more, not less. No matter how many died - hundreds, thousands - the food was just enough. The Udupi king was the one who was responsible for the food. How did he get it so right? Before

Do you want all or nothing at all? Will you be any different when you done either way? When Sage Yajnavalkya was asked “What is God?” He said Neti, Neti. What you can observe is not the Divine. So, one started discarding everything that was observable. The body, the emotions,

Through the infinite vastness of consciousness, I steal my individuality. It is fleeting I know. But pride in that momentary existence is intoxicating. White light pours on this table; but brown it looks. Pure love enters me; but Me I become. Are we what we get; or what we let

Survival is predicated on Prejudice. Free thought is risky. In the diversity of creation, where there are natural foes and neutral entities, every being seeks safety of the known. Known ally is that which conforms. Deviance is enmity. When society seeks order – it really seeks a “conformity” in a set

The East India Company received the Royal Charter from Queen [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_I_of_England?utm_campaign=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.getrevue.co%2F%3Futm_source%3Dnewsletter%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3DInsightful%2520newsletter%2520of%2520Drishtikone&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Revue%20newsletter] Elizabeth