“Your assumptions are your windows on the world. Scrub them off every once in a while, or the light won't come in.” ― Isaac Asimov
When Megasthenes wrote his book Indica around 30 BC, he talked about different groups within Indian society. He pointed to seven different types. The most highly regarded were the ‘philosophers’ or Yogis as we know them. They would guide people and were the most honored. But also the worst off in society. (Read here Source) Incidentally, the Brit who translated the text called these groups “seven castes.” Difficult to escape prejudices, even in semantics! There were no Brahmins or Shudras.
None of the major travelers mentioned anything about any debilitating caste system in their memoirs as well.
So how did such a thing come to hurt the Indian society and also define it? The answer lies in how the anthropologists, historians, and sociologists that came to write defining treatises on India were Christian missionaries with one aim - convert the ‘pagans.’ And, they were clear that their main objective was to “Destroy Brahmanism, root, and branch…” – utterly annihilate it. Why? Because the Brahmins, as they called them, were the toughest people to convert! (read Imperialism by Narratives – When Hindus have 'nothing to give up')
The imperatives of colonial power grab - mentally and psychologically subverting the ruled - came to describe those people for generations to come. Even now, in American school textbooks, the Caste system is universally sold as the most defining aspect of Hindus, when a careful look at history tells us that it was imposed by a colonial power for the purpose of colonial subjugation and slavery.
That is how semantics, assumptions, and definitions within the larger literature and narratives work.
As the world moves to a future of Artificial Intelligence-based systems, people assume that the biases, prejudices, and the mala-fide narratives that human minds carry will be redundant. Well, that may not be the case at all. AI may be a mirror of our own world and have the potential to redefine the winners and losers in the neo-colonial restructuring. All, with prejudices and bigotry built-in!
NOTE: We have created a one-page notice/ad for the Drishtikone newsletter. If you have the means and would like to help spread the word, you can print it and paste it at grocery stores, restaurants, colleges, and other venues that allow it. You can download from here - Newsletter Ad.
The structures of domination of one man by another have been deep and mostly emerged from the European and Arab societies. There are two main forms, which are used interchangeably though having a nuanced difference, that have been the forms of domination. Imperialism and Colonialism.
Although imperialism and colonialism focus on the suppression of another, if colonialism refers to the process of a country taking physical control of another, imperialism refers to the political and monetary dominance, either formally or informally. Colonialism is seen to be the architect deciding how to start dominating areas and then imperialism can be seen as creating the idea behind conquest cooperating with colonialism. Colonialism is when the imperial nation begins a conquest over an area and then eventually is able to rule over the areas the previous nation had controlled. Colonialism's core meaning is the exploitation of the valuable assets and supplies of the nation that was conquered and the conquering nation then gaining the benefits from the spoils of the war. (Source: Painter, Joe; Jeffrey, Alex (2009). Political Geography)
Imperialism sets the stage for the suppressor to take over the actual physical control. Over the past few decades, physical control of territory may have become tough. At least in an overt manner.
But the structures created to exercise domination over other people by the European and American powers remain intact. That is where the concept of coloniality of power comes from.
The "coloniality of power" is an expression coined by Anibal Quijano to name the structures of power, control, and hegemony that have emerged during the modernist era, the era of colonialism, which stretches from the conquest of the Americas to the present. (Source)
It isn’t just power being exercised. But a hegemonic power to control others.
The age of colonialism started after Columbus came in touch with the natives in the Americas and Europe used that wealth and riches that slavery provided to build a structure of coloniality.
The Spanish conquest of the Americas provided Europe with a means of entry into the world economy: money. Ironically, the massive influx of gold and silver corrupted and depressed Spain itself. Its vitality fled to the Americas, while the ability to use Europe's new wealth moved north, to the shipping and banking companies of England and Holland. 1700 marks a moment of consolidation of an Atlantic economy: and trans-Atlantic commerce in agricultural goods and metals between the Americas to Europe; the codification of slavery in the English colonies of North America; and English and Dutch control of shipping trade to the east. In 200 years, the indigenous population of the Caribbean region, and much of Mexico and Peru, had been decimated, and the slave trade that replenished it with Africans had become the most profitable industry in the entire Atlantic economy. The so-called age of enlightenment opened and flourished with the dark groans of dark men and women in the unlit holds of ships, carried to a darker destiny, while pouring untold wealth into the vaults of Europe. It shifted the center of the world economy to the Atlantic. It was not Europe that put America on the map. It was the Americas -- the land of the Americas, the seizure and transformation of that land into European property, the destruction of the societies that had lived on that land, and the seizure of African people to be enslaved on that land -- that put Europe on the map. (Source)
The coloniality - structures that were created to maintain dominance over the local population, for example, necessitated the destruction of the native social ways and demonizing the existing set up while creating fissures.
Even though India and Hinduism, in particular, has become synonymous with Caste System, the fact is that professional historians and philologists like Nicholas Dirks, GS Ghurye, Richard Eaton, David Shulman, and Cynthia Talbot in their various readings of the pre-colonial written records in royal court documents and traveler accounts have found mention of any caste system either missing or hardly there. Some of the early British commentators wrote at that time that caste system was a useless way to understand India and something that makes no sense in view of ground realities.
WR Cornish, who supervised census operations in the Madras Presidency in 1871, wrote that "… regarding the origin of caste we can place no reliance upon the statements made in the Hindu sacred writings. Whether there was ever a period in which the Hindus were composed of four classes is exceedingly doubtful". Similarly, CF Magrath, leader and author of a monograph on the 1871 Bihar census, wrote, "that the now meaningless division into the four castes alleged to have been made by Manu should be put aside". Anthropologist Susan Bayly writes that "until well into the colonial period, much of the subcontinent was still populated by people for whom the formal distinctions of caste were of only limited importance, even in parts of the so-called Hindu heartland… The institutions and beliefs which are now often described as the elements of traditional caste were only just taking shape as recently as the early 18th Century". (Source)
India, a remarkably diverse and complex yet much harmonious society was broken down into a ‘simpler’ union for the enabling the British to govern it. Colonialism’s needs, you see. The caste system provided a reductionist tool to wipe out the diversity and yet create fissures and divisions.
Injection of a false premise and narrative created a monster and thrust upon an entire population which had nothing to even do with it! Books, treatises, laws, constitution, and even social benefits and politics were built upon this false demon’s curse.
Why care about coloniality in today’s age?
Why is this important now?!
Because the systems and algorithms for tomorrow’s social structures - whether they are in the form of social media platforms or analytical processes - are being informed by the same coloniality. As this intriguing article in MIT Technology Review suggests - the problems that Artificial Intelligence has today are rooted in the coloniality that has taken shape centuries ago. Karen Hao, the senior AI reporter at MIT Technology Review writes.
The ties between algorithmic discrimination and colonial racism are perhaps the most obvious: algorithms built to automate procedures and trained on data within a racially unjust society end up replicating those racist outcomes in their results. But much of the scholarship on this type of harm from AI focuses on examples in the US. Examining it in the context of coloniality allows for a global perspective: America isn’t the only place with social inequities. “There are always groups that are identified and subjected,” Isaac says. (Source)
Is that even true? Do prejudice, racism, and bigotry seep into the AI algorithm surreptitiously? Here is a powerful example of how this perpetuates.
How do you mitigate this?
Now, Karen’s idea with respect to creating a Decolonial AI is to include a diverse representation of people and interests.
The benefit of examining the harmful impacts of AI through this lens, the researchers argue, is the framework it provides for predicting and mitigating future harm. Png believes that there’s really no such thing as “unintended consequences”—just consequences of the blind spots organizations and research institutions have when they lack diverse representation. (Source)
But the larger question is that those who were subjugated and tinkered as imperial subjects while the colonial masters injected false narratives and structures that were not even part of the subjects’ history - done merely for the ease of suppression - can they really represent themselves?
Is identity-based representation the real way to decolonialize future AI? Or to decontaminate the histories, anthropologies, and sociologies that have been thrust upon the erstwhile marginalized and the ruled?
And, then the real question is how do you roll back the devil that was unleashed by a colonial power in the hapless populations as their identities even when they weren’t true of them? The caste system, for example!
With the coming in of Artificial Intelligence as a tool of economic, social and military domination in the future, we are looking at a redefinition of the existing power structures.
“Artificial intelligence is the future... Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world,” declared Vladimir Putin, speaking before a group of Russian students and journalists in September 2017. Three days later, Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX and Tesla, went even further in a tweet: “Competition for AI superiority at national level most likely cause of WW3 imo [in my opinion].” (Source)
Yes, the AI machinery is fueled by content that bears the contamination of coloniality. But it’s power is in the hands of those who have the means and intelligence. That is changing.
Most commentators are calling out the fortunes of the future world as a battle between the American and the Chinese systems.
In these new emerging structures, while Europe - given its passive trajectory - may at best be able to salvage a position marked as “cyber-vassalization.”
Africa will see a return of slavery of another kind. The “cyber-colonization.”
The convergence of Big Data, Machine Learning, and the increasing Computational power will create a system of Artificial Intelligence-powered architecture that can help a few actors and powers monopolize the rest of the world.
Contrary to the common notion according to which the digital revolution necessarily involves economic decentralization, it is actually possible that AI may cause, or reinforce, an overall trend toward the centralization of power in the hands of a few actors. These digital empires would benefit from economies of scale and the acceleration of their concentration of power in the economic, military, and political fields thanks to AI. They would become the major poles governing the totality of international affairs, returning to a “logic of blocs.” These new public-private digital empires would extend to the continental scale, especially in the case of the American and Chinese empires, while other actors, such as Europe, would adopt strategies of non-alignment. (Source)
Knowledge and education systems were used by the British to embed self-hatred in Indians, specifically the Hindus. It was a mechanism to wipe out any challenge to their authority as colonial rulers.
And, semantics of the knowledge systems is where it all starts.
So let us look at the equivalent for Artificial Intelligence. In AI, the language is not just a means but the code with embedded intelligence.
For example, OpenAI is a company founded by Elon Musk, Sam Altman and others. It is an AI research laboratory that has a for-profit and a non-profit arm. It has created a language structural model called Generative Pre-Training (GPT) for AI systems.
GPT-2 stands for “Generative Pre-Training 2”: generative, because we are generating text; pre-training, because instead of training the model for any one specific task, we’re using unsupervised “pre-training” such that the general model can perform on a variety of tasks; and 2, because it’s the second model using this approach, following the first GPT model. (Source)
Now, OpenAI Inc. has created the structure for its third generation model - the GPT-3. An auto-regressive language model with 175 billion parameters.
OpenAI recently published GPT-3, the largest language model ever trained. GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters and would require 355 years and $4,600,000 to train - even with the lowest priced GPU cloud on the market. (Source)
A few OpenAI researchers looked at GPT-3 and its characteristics. Among other things they shared “concerns about bias, fairness, and broader societal impacts, and attempt a preliminary analysis of GPT-3’s characteristics in this regard.” (Download the study here - Source)
One of the areas in the “Malicious uses of language models” that they looked at was “Fairness, Bias, and Representation.” They found that these models carried the stereotypes and biases in them for religious and racial identities.
The stereotypes that proliferate in the internet and literature do inform the language models are create biases and prejudices.
When they looked at the sentiment prevalent in the model with respect to race, they found that racial prejudices were deeply embedded.
Indians and Asians (Chinese etc) had highly positive sentiments, while Black, White and Middle-eastern had the lowest (Blacks being the worst off consistently).
Now see what happens in case of religions. What is Hinduism associated with?
The false and divisive narratives that are built by those who follow an agenda start to inform the next-gen language models. Mega machine learning model, created by OpenAI, that will write tomorrow’sop-eds, poems, articles, and even operating code!
market corner: 10 quick bytes
- Govt procures paddy worth Rs 92,121 cr so far at MSP; purchase in volume terms up 25% - more
- Unemployment rate at 6-month high in Dec despite revival signs - more
- Discoms’ outstanding dues to power gencos rise 35 pc to Rs 1.41 lakh cr in Nov - more
- The auto sector may witness double-digit growth in 2021 - more
- GST arm unearths Rs 832 crore tax evasion by illegal ‘pan masala’ factory - more
- Govt seeks to net Rs 1-lakh-crore investments - more
- Andhra Pradesh faces debt burden of Rs 3.73 lakh crore: CAG - more
- Rs 1 lakh crore disputed tax to be settled under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme: Finance ministry official - more
- SII: ₹200 per dose for 100 mn shots - more
- Private banks witnessed a rise in NPAs in large borrowal accounts in FY20: RBI - more
Where’s Jack Ma?: The Billionaire tech tycoon, Jack Ma, has mysteriously vanished from his own reality show after bravely criticizing China's regime. Super-rich Jack Ma - reported to be worth at least £35bn - has not been seen in public since late October (Source)
Sinking world: The sinking of the ground's surface — or 'subsidence' — will threaten nearly a fifth of the world's population (635 million people within two decades) come the year 2040, a study has warned. An international team of researchers led by Spain has created a new model that estimates local subsidence risks across the globe. (Source)
Meat taxes?: The same amount of greenhouse gas emissions result from the production of organic meat as regular meats, a study has concluded. Researchers from Germany calculate the emissions produced during the manufacture of regular and organic meat, as well as plant-based foodstuffs. Organic and regular beef are just as environmentally damaging, they concluded — while organic chicken actually results in slightly more greenhouse emissions overall. Based on their findings, the team proposed that policy measures — 'meat taxes' — are needed to 'close the gap between current market prices and the true costs of food.' (Source)
Its World War III: Dr. Nick Kwan, the assistant medical director of emergency services at Alhambra Hospital in Los Angeles County, spent it with a COVID-19 patient who went into code blue — cardiac or respiratory arrest — five separate times. Code blue requires the medical staff to summon a quick and intense response to resuscitate the patient. "This is a full-on Category 10. ... It's literally World War III," he said. "It's not the volume of patients," he said. "It's the intensity and sickness of the patients. I've never thought some of these numbers are compatible with life, with patients coming in sicker than you can imagine." (Source)
Jews population in Israel drops: For the first time since the founding of the State of Israel, the country's Jewish population dropped below 74%, according to the Israeli Immigration Policy Center (IPC), which cited data from the Central Bureau of Statistics. The Central Bureau of Statistics classified Israelis in one of three ways: Jewish, Arab, and Other. The Jewish population in Israel decreased from 74.1% in 2019 to 73.9%, a drop of 0.2%. Half of the drop in the Jewish population proportion (0.1%) is due to the increase in the Arab population and the other half is due to an increase in the population proportion of the Other category (Source)
A society’s culture seeps and impacts every area and organization. Here is an interesting discussion on why Arabs keep losing wars. Whether in Iraq, against ISIS, or the 6-day war against Israel. Here are some random notes from the video. These issues stem from the social norms and cultural ways of Arabic society.
- Arab junior officers are well trained on the technical aspects of their weapons and tactical know-how, but not in leadership
Training tends to be unimaginative, cut and dried, and not challenging.
- Most Arab officers treat enlisted soldiers like sub-humans
- The idea of taking care of one's men is found only among the most elite units
- Decisions are made and delivered from on high, with very little lateral communication. This leads to a highly centralized system, with authority hardly ever delegated.
Check it out!
Today’s ONLINE PAPER: Check out today’s “The Drishtikone Daily” edition. - THE DRISHTIKONE DAILY
TOOLS WE USE (our secret recipe): Here are some tools we use to streamline our work and do things in a lean and agile manner.
Evernote: One-stop shop for all note-taking and content clipping - this tool has notes, articles (~10,000) saved since 2005 which go into our research (have used their premium plan - very powerful!) // Fiverr: Get everything done by professionals for much less money. The most important marketplace for great talent! // Grammarly: your personal grammar checking tool (indispensable for writers)// Ferns n Petals: Send cakes, flowers, gifts, rakhis in India (tried and tested for 5 years!) // Sling TV: throw out the expensive cable and dish TV and get the same channels for less // Bluehost (US): Cheap and powerful website hosting (start a site for just $3.95/month - for India use this link -> Bluehost-India to start a site for $199/month) // Headliner App: Create amazing videos from the podcast/audio files with FB/Twitter integration (get 2 weeks free) - we use it for our podcasts
[These are referral links - which may provide us with some consideration at no cost to the user]
SUPPORT DRISHTIKONE: If you consider our work important and enriching and would like to contribute to our expenses, please click on the button below to go to the page to send in your contribution. You can select the currency (for example, INR or USD, etc) and the amount you would like to contribute. Contribute to Drishtikone
If you like this post - please share it with someone who will appreciate the information shared in this edition
If you like our newsletter, please share it with your friends and family