This is Modi's election. And in that, this election is a battle for Indians to wrestle back their identities that have been assaulted and demonized. In order to facilitate colonial structures that perpetuate slavery. This Indian election is an exercise in freedom.
The Case against Patanjali by Indian Medical Association and the tone of Judiciary is alarming. We need to look into its historical and global context to fully grasp its ramification.
Why do seemingly normal people commit atrocities and genocides? More importantly, why do millions other go along with these crimes as participants? We explore the Perpetration-Induced Trauma and its impact on the societies.
Ironically, the money set aside for the poorest of the poor in India – in Billions of Dollars – could very well be contributing their bit to high Gold prices in the world!
Fact 1: Sixty per cent of the beneficiaries are non-poor.
Fact 2: The non-poor receive 17 per cent more workdays than the poor.
Fact 3: The MGNREGA non-poor are in the top third of the consumption distribution of rural Indians — at the 66th percentile compared to the 14th percentile for the poor beneficiaries. The poor who do participate are right in the middle of the poverty distribution, so at least this aspect of the programme is working well. Presumably, they are also doing whatever work is being done. It is unlikely that someone belonging to the top third of the distribution is indulging in desperate backbreaking work for low wages.
Fact 4: The expenditure patterns of the poor and non-poor beneficiaries are revealing. The poor spend Rs 62 per household per year on jewellery. The non-poor MGNREGA beneficiaries spend close to eight times that amount, or Rs 487 a year. For the MGNREGA non-poor, fully 14 per cent goes towards purchase of jewellery, compared to only 2 per cent for the MGNREGA poor.
Fact 5: On an all-India basis, some Rs 8830 crore were paid as wages to the MGNREGA non-poor; and some Rs 1260 crore went towards jewellery purchases.
Worth looking at are the Facts 1 and 5.
The Indian tax payer is seemingly financing roughly $260 million Jewellery Purchases under this scheme which is ostensibly billed for the “poorest of the poor”. No wonder, the Gold prices are so high.
I understand that Bhalla’s analysis is statistical based on proportions of expenditure basket of the group the money goes to. I also understand that my question may be rhetorical in the title of this post. But the level of plunder that is orchestrated by this scheme by the UPA Government is NOT.
It doesn’t matter what the money is being spent on, but the money isn’t going where it should. It is probably doing worse than fueling World’s Gold Prices – its fueling India’s runaway inflation and bankruptcy.
Every Sunday AM (US Time)/ PM (India time), we send out a weekly detailed newsletter. We also share other insightful notes during the week. Its free. Do sign up and share with friends!